Difference between revisions of "User:Nanaumes"
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==text== | ||
| + | ===the problem with work=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class=fourcol> | ||
| + | |||
| + | By folowing the worker not only from arketplace to workplace, but also from the place of employment to the domestic space,wefindevi- dencenotonlyofclashierarchy,butofspecificalygenderedformsof exploitationandpaternsofinequality.Bydescendingintotheeven morehiden,evenmorefiercelyprivatizedspaceofthehousehold,we semenandwomenwhomaybeformalyequalunderthelawtrans- formedthroughthegenderdivisionoflaborintorelativelyprivileged andpenalizedsubjects. | ||
| + | Thus,Marxistfeministsinthe1970Sexploredthe meansbywhichgenderhierarchiesdeliverunwagedwomenworkersto thedomesticmodeofreproductionwhilealsoensuringacheaperand moreflexiblesecondaryortertiarywagedlaborforce.Thesefeminists debatedtheexactvaluetocapitalofwomen'sunwageddomesticlabor andexposedthehyperexploitationofwomenwageearnersaroundthe globe.Andtheystudiedtheinterconectionsamongthefamily,the labormarket,wagedandunwagedlaborproceses,andthewelfarestate. Aswewilse,infact,manyoftheirinsightsintotheconditionsof women'slaborunderFordismwilprovetobemorewidelyaplicableto theformsofworktypicalofpost-Fordisteconomies.Byextendingthese efortstopublicize,politicize,andtransformworkintothefieldofdo- mesticlabor,feministsusefulycomplicatedandupedtheanteofal threprojects.Whatmighthaveatfirstapearedtobeasimpleadition toMarxistanalyseshasinfactrequiredavastrethinkingofitsconcepts andmodels,itscriticalanalysesandutopianvisions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | __notoc__ | ||
Latest revision as of 15:43, 28 October 2025
bold
- ♪
- ♪
- ♪
1
2
3
text[edit]
the problem with work[edit]
By folowing the worker not only from arketplace to workplace, but also from the place of employment to the domestic space,wefindevi- dencenotonlyofclashierarchy,butofspecificalygenderedformsof exploitationandpaternsofinequality.Bydescendingintotheeven morehiden,evenmorefiercelyprivatizedspaceofthehousehold,we semenandwomenwhomaybeformalyequalunderthelawtrans- formedthroughthegenderdivisionoflaborintorelativelyprivileged andpenalizedsubjects. Thus,Marxistfeministsinthe1970Sexploredthe meansbywhichgenderhierarchiesdeliverunwagedwomenworkersto thedomesticmodeofreproductionwhilealsoensuringacheaperand moreflexiblesecondaryortertiarywagedlaborforce.Thesefeminists debatedtheexactvaluetocapitalofwomen'sunwageddomesticlabor andexposedthehyperexploitationofwomenwageearnersaroundthe globe.Andtheystudiedtheinterconectionsamongthefamily,the labormarket,wagedandunwagedlaborproceses,andthewelfarestate. Aswewilse,infact,manyoftheirinsightsintotheconditionsof women'slaborunderFordismwilprovetobemorewidelyaplicableto theformsofworktypicalofpost-Fordisteconomies.Byextendingthese efortstopublicize,politicize,andtransformworkintothefieldofdo- mesticlabor,feministsusefulycomplicatedandupedtheanteofal threprojects.Whatmighthaveatfirstapearedtobeasimpleadition toMarxistanalyseshasinfactrequiredavastrethinkingofitsconcepts andmodels,itscriticalanalysesandutopianvisions.
