Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(test2) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | we can speak about monoskop here. | |
− | == | + | == central + east europe geography == |
− | + | the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer. | |
− | + | why not define the context | |
+ | by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. | ||
+ | --[[User:Dusan]], 3 Aug 2004 (CEST) | ||
− | + | :just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity, | |
+ | no? | ||
+ | --[[User:XGZ]] 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST) | ||
− | + | hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world | |
+ | outdated discussion? | ||
+ | what have i been doing all that time? | ||
+ | hibernating? | ||
− | + | missed the paradigm update. | |
+ | come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, | ||
+ | possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? | ||
+ | east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? | ||
+ | --[[User:Dusan]], 4 Aug 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :whellllllllllll started reading: | ||
+ | |||
+ | balkan as a metaphor | ||
+ | (between globalization and fragmentation) | ||
+ | by dusan bjelic and obrad savic | ||
+ | mit press 2002 | ||
+ | --[[User:XGZ]] 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::outdated discussion - have the same feeling | ||
+ | - too many times built border between west and east by discussing and | ||
+ | mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions | ||
+ | where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those | ||
+ | countries were together in socialistic block | ||
+ | - today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined | ||
+ | culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies / | ||
+ | subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds | ||
+ | - central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital | ||
+ | media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same | ||
+ | time to west then us | ||
+ | - the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic | ||
+ | talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative | ||
+ | but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...) | ||
+ | --[[User:Marisa]] 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
Revision as of 15:45, 6 August 2004
we can speak about monoskop here.
central + east europe geography
the former Monoskop geo discourse was targeted to CE+EE territory, after the discussion, the geo was widened to Europa. talk to this subject not over, there is much more to answer.
why not define the context by geo & ideo borders? -- c+e europe & digital media. --User:Dusan, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- just europa (geographically), and changing perception and expressivity,
no? --User:XGZ 20:02, 3 Aug 2004 (CEST)
hm, central+east europe vs rest of the world outdated discussion? what have i been doing all that time? hibernating?
missed the paradigm update. come back to 90s and send me the link to upgrade me, possible? sth to read. how did it all happened? east/west 0's&1's media discourse. any good references? --User:Dusan, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- whellllllllllll started reading:
balkan as a metaphor (between globalization and fragmentation) by dusan bjelic and obrad savic mit press 2002 --User:XGZ 19:38, 4 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- outdated discussion - have the same feeling
- too many times built border between west and east by discussing and mapping regions of central or eastern europe, too many discussions where the border lies, they didn't find anything just that those countries were together in socialistic block - today: whatever field in ce+e europe, defined culture-geographicaly, can be perfect topic for individual studies / subject in university curiccula, but not for our adventures minds - central europe (warschaw countries) and eastern europe in digital media have not so much in common, balkan far and closer at the same time to west then us - the terms central eastern europe i use also but just in academic talks and grant applications (academic doesn't need to be negative but just present in scholars', or education, scientific context...) --User:Marisa 08:19, 05 Aug 2004 (CEST)